Skip to content
Graph of Plan

Non-Developers Can Verify Agent Output

Non-technical users can verify that AI agent output is correct without understanding the underlying code, enabling trust in agent actions.

The Assumption

“Non-Developers Want AI Tools” assumes non-devs can use agents. But can they trust the output? If an agent writes code and executes it:

  • How does a non-dev know if it worked?
  • How do they catch errors?
  • How do they verify correctness?

If non-devs can’t verify output, they either:

  • Trust blindly (dangerous)
  • Require developer review (defeats the purpose)
  • Don’t use agents at all

Evidence

Supporting signals:

  • Non-devs verify Excel formula results by checking outputs
  • No-code tools have visual feedback loops
  • AI can explain its reasoning in plain language
  • Sandboxing limits blast radius of errors

Counter-signals:

  • Code output is often invisible (database changes, API calls)
  • Errors may not be immediately apparent
  • “It ran without errors” ≠ “It did the right thing”
  • Non-devs don’t know what questions to ask

What Would Prove This Wrong

  • Non-devs frequently accept incorrect agent output
  • Trust gap prevents non-dev adoption entirely
  • Non-devs require developer review for all actions
  • Support burden from “is this right?” questions unsustainable

Impact If Wrong

If non-devs can’t verify output:

  • SmartBoxes TAM shrinks to developer-only
  • P4gent becomes unviable
  • Need to build heavy guardrails and approval workflows
  • “AI for non-devs” positioning fails

Testing Plan

User testing:

  • Give non-devs tasks with known-incorrect agent output
  • Measure: Do they catch the errors?
  • Track trust levels and confidence

Product design:

  • Build verification UX (show what agent did, in plain language)
  • Test whether this enables non-dev verification
  • Measure error catch rate

Metrics:

  • Error detection rate by non-devs
  • Trust scores over time
  • Support ticket analysis

Depends on:

Affects:

Assumption

Non-technical users can verify that AI agent output is correct without understanding the underlying code, enabling trust in agent actions.

Depends On

This assumption only matters if these are true:

How To Test

User testing with non-developers. Track error rates and trust metrics in beta cohort.

Validation Criteria

This assumption is validated if:

  • Non-devs catch over 80% of agent errors through output inspection
  • Non-devs report high confidence in agent actions
  • Support tickets show non-devs can self-diagnose issues

Invalidation Criteria

This assumption is invalidated if:

  • Non-devs frequently accept incorrect agent output
  • Trust gap prevents non-dev adoption
  • Non-devs require developer review for all agent actions

Dependent Products

If this assumption is wrong, these products are affected: